thakis added a comment. In D70340#1748975 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70340#1748975>, @rnk wrote:
> In D70340#1748712 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70340#1748712>, @ > > > > > > I guess I was thinking about enabling this only in +asserts builds, so we pay > zero overhead in release builds. I was also thinking that if we do implement > the "constructor is key for class debug info" flag in the near term, this > becomes obsolete. But it's not that much code churn, and it reduces DWARF > size with GCC. I guess we could land it after all. :) With the overhead being the cost of a single vtable with one entry? Or is there more? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70340/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70340 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
