simon_tatham added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsARM.td:780 def int_arm_vctp8 : Intrinsic<[llvm_v16i1_ty], [llvm_i32_ty], [IntrNoMem]>; def int_arm_vctp16 : Intrinsic<[llvm_v8i1_ty], [llvm_i32_ty], [IntrNoMem]>; ---------------- dmgreen wrote: > Should we rename int_arm_vctp8 to int_arm_mve_vctp8? Ha! What you mean by this and the next comment is "Simon, you are totally wrong when you claim in the commit message that these intrinsics are for NEON as well". :-) I was misled myself by the lack of "mve" in the name. So yes, now I've found out that they //are// MVE-specific, I agree I should put it in! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70485/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70485 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
