shafik added a comment.
In D70524#1767775 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70524#1767775>, @aprantl wrote:
> @shafik Can you speak about whether this feature ("auto" return type in DWARF
> v5 section 5.2) would be useful for LLDB?
I agree with @dblaikie here, I can't come up with a scenario where this would
be required. Unless like he mentioned we emit all the function declarations,
which we don't.
@probinson I was reading the C++ "auto" return type
<http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=131217.1> issue and I can't come up
with a case where we don't have class descriptions across compilation units
that are not consistent wrt to auto return type. Do you have a specific example?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70524/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70524
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
