NoQ added a comment. In D71224#1778284 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71224#1778284>, @xazax.hun wrote:
> So I was wondering if we got the default right. Maybe a checker should do > more work to get the escaping rather than more work preventing it? But that's exactly how it works right now(?) If you don't define `checkPointerEscape` you get no escaping, if you do extra work of defining it you get the exact amount of escaping that you want. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71224/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71224 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
