efriedma added a comment.

I'm not sure it's legal to transform a non-faulting load to a load with a 
non-faulting flag?  At least, we'd need to consider the implications of that 
very carefully.  In particular, I'm concerned about the interaction with 
intrinsics that read/write FFR.  I mean, you could specify that loads marked 
MONonFaulting actually write to the FFR register, but that seems confusing.

It seems simpler to preserve the intrinsic until isel, at least for now.



================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:4490
+        return getConstant(Val.zextOrTrunc(VT.getScalarSizeInBits()), DL, VT,
+                           C->isTargetOpcode(), C->isOpaque());
+      case ISD::SIGN_EXTEND:
----------------
I'm not sure how this is related.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D71556/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D71556



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to