weimingz added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17741#364756, @thakis wrote:
> Instead of doing this, would it make sense to have a flag like > -ffile-basename that changes what __FILE__ expands to? > > I had wished I'd be able to have some control over __FILE__ (I'd like to say > "make all __FILE__s relative to this given directory for my use case), and > changing __FILE__ to something else in all the world's code isn't easy – so > maybe having a flag that provides some control over __FILE__ instead of > adding a separate macro would be a good idea. do you mean this? if source file is /a/b/c/d/foo.c and if -ffile-name-stem-remove=/a/b/c, then _FILE_ will be expanded to "d/foo.c" ? http://reviews.llvm.org/D17741 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
