dnsampaio added a comment.

In D72932#1829716 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72932#1829716>, @ostannard wrote:

> Why are you doing this in CodeGen, rather than adjusting the existing layout 
> code in CGRecordLowering? Doing it this way will result in 
> AdjustAAPCSBitfieldLValue being called for every access to the bitfield, 
> rather than just once. This is probably more fragile too, because it's 
> spreading the logic across multiple parts of the codebase, and has to undo 
> some of the layout done by CGRecordLowering.


@ostannard Indeed, after looking at the `CGRecordLayout` I am not kind for 
doing this change. It will require changing all possible initializations, with 
a sensible value. And either way, codegen will also need to change, to define 
the address, it must know if it is volatile or not. I don't believe that 
recomputing it a every access would pose much of an overhead, perhaps we can 
leave it as a TODO to move it there?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D72932/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D72932



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to