njames93 marked an inline comment as done. njames93 added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/IdentifierNamingCheck.cpp:340 + return false; + if (FDecl->getAccess() == AS_private || FDecl->getAccess() == AS_protected) + return false; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > I'd flip the logic to `!= AS_public` to be more clear that we only care about > public members. What do you think about AS_none, its a weird case and shall i ignore it. I'm guessing all functions not in a class are implicitly declared to be public. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73098/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73098 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
