aaron.ballman added a comment. In D72448#1844032 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72448#1844032>, @njames93 wrote:
> Hmm a lot of the code in the redundant-string-init check is designed to be > macro unsafe. Not sure the best way to follow up, discard the old macro > behaviour or keep it Designed to be macro unsafe, or just didn't consider macros in the first place? I'm not seeing anything that makes me think macros were taken into account, but maybe you're looking at something different from me. Do you have an example of where you think something was designed to be macro unsafe? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72448/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72448 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
