MaskRay added a comment. In D72829#1844050 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72829#1844050>, @serge-sans-paille wrote:
> @MaskRay should we add a verifier step to check that > pie/pic/semanticinterposition module flags are consistent, or leave that to > clang ? I suppose you mean whether "SemanticInterposition" should be invalidated when `"PIC Level"` does not exist or `"PIE Level"` exists. I am a bit inclined to make it more flexible/orthogonal in the backend, i.e. SemanticInterposition is in affect even if "PIE Level" is set. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72829/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72829 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits