aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h:6763 +/// matches the expression 'new (Storage) MyClass()'. +AST_MATCHER(CXXNewExpr, isPlacement) { return Node.getNumPlacementArgs() > 0; } + ---------------- I think a better design would be something like `hasPlacementExpr()` as a traversal matcher. Then `isPlacement()` can be trivially done in the project as `hasPlacementExpr(anything())` (we could still consider adding it as a dedicated matcher, but it doesn't seem critical to me), but this would also allow people to check for specific placement new argument expressions. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73562/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73562 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits