Now I'm completely confused... :-) Can we rely that this MS engineer has enough authority to declare this to be a bug?
And more importantly -- is MS willing to fix the [supposed] bug in future MSVC compilers? I frankly don't think so... Either way, it's up to Reid to decide what to do. Reid? Yours, Andrey ===== Software Engineer Intel Compiler Team On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote: > I spoke with a Microsoft compiler engineer who said this is most > likely a bug that static_assert works in C mode in MSVC. Based on > that, I would strongly prefer to not accept this patch. > > ~Aaron > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote: >> I will talk to someone about this tomorrow to see if I can get a >> better feel, thank you for the reminder. >> >> ~Aaron >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits >> <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> rnk accepted this revision. >>> rnk added a comment. >>> This revision is now accepted and ready to land. >>> >>> lgtm >>> >>> >>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D17444 >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cfe-commits mailing list >>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
