rsmith added a comment. In D67678#1836953 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678#1836953>, @dexonsmith wrote:
> In D67678#1836922 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678#1836922>, @rsmith wrote: > > > If there's no timeline to update the macOS SDK, then perhaps we could add a > > hack to Clang to allow these conversions only in limited contexts (the > > specific parts of the macOS SDK that are relying on them). Do you know how > > many such places there might be? If it's just a few functions, we could > > match against the function names, or depending on what `SIMD_CFUNC` expands > > to, perhaps we could match that. Failing that, we could set a > > platform-specific default or similar. > > > A hack like this sounds pragmatic to me. An initial look suggests it's a > small number of frameworks; I suspect many functions, but we could > potentially match on partial file path or `SIMD_CFUNC`. We need a deeper > audit across our internal stack to be sure, though. I don't think we'll have > bandwidth for that until ~late February. OK, that seems fine to me. I don't want this to miss another release if we can avoid it, but that should give plenty of time to iterate on something that keeps your SDK building :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
