jdoerfert added a comment. In D74571#1876617 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D74571#1876617>, @kkwli0 wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments. It makes sense to keep the warning there before > any ptx65 features are added. The warning should also apply to both the CUDA > and OpenMP compile paths. As a result, I will pursue to ignore the warning > in the build of libomp (i.e. libomp_check_linker_flag function in > LibompCheckLinkerFlag.cmake). I think it is less pervasive and also can > avoid similar occurrence when a new version of CUDA toolkit is available. > > If users are annoyed by many many warning messages in the build, as @tra > suggested, users can just use -Wno-unknown-cuda-version to suppress it. > > Comments? That sounds like the right approach for OpenMP. We require a minimal CUDA version, based on what we use internally, but no maximal version if possible since we don't use new features anyway. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74571/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74571 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
