njames93 added a comment.

In D74689#1879065 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D74689#1879065>, @hokein wrote:

> Thanks for the patch. May I know the motivation of this patch? Personally, 
> I'd be conservative of exposing too many options.


I was using custom classes with a different naming convention which was not 
being picked up by this check. Right now this check is only good for classes 
that mimick the stl conventions.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D74689/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D74689



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to