lebedev.ri added a comment. In D74918#1931488 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D74918#1931488>, @zoecarver wrote:
> @lebedev.ri LLVM may be better, I'm not sure. If you feel strongly I can move > it. I do think that it makes much more sense somewhere closer to the backend > @jyknight I'm planning on adding a builtin that uses this method. I can put > the patch up for that first if you would like. but that being said, currently nothing needs that and with all those concerns about exposing this info, i'd hold off moving it until it is settled whether it is needed (and not a dead code) in the first place :/ Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74918/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74918 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
