On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Craig, Ben <ben.cr...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> I know that MIPS does that, and an out-of-tree implementation of hexagon > implements 1-byte cmpxchg in terms of the 4-byte version. The emulation > code isn't particularly small, and it seems reasonable to make it a libcall. That's fine. Either do it inline or via an out-of-line version of the same code, in a libcall. Either way acts the same, that is something that the target backend can decide to do whenever it wants. The important property for Clang is that it know whether it's lock-free or not. And I don't believe there's any reason to use a mutex to implement a 1-byte ,cmpxchg on a platform with a 4-byte cmpxchg instruction available. The emulation code seems sketchy from a correctness perspective, as you > end up generating unsolicited loads and stores on adjacent bytes. I disagree. I do not see how expanding a subword cmpxchg into a word-size-and-aligned cmpxchg could possibly cause a problem.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
