dexonsmith added a comment. In D70366#1970299 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70366#1970299>, @LevitatingLion wrote:
> Maybe we can add an additional string attribute when adding the noinline > attribute to functions which are not marked noinline in the source code, > something like "noinline-added-by-clang". I don't know if that's a legitimate > use case for a string attribute, but it wouldn't be very invasive. What do > you think? Another option (not sure if it's better) would be to add a `noopt` LLVM attribute that Clang adds for `-O0` instead of `noinline`. Two possibilities would be to update the inliner to pay attention to that as well (with special logic for `flatten`), or to change the always-inliner to add `noinline` to anything marked `noopt`. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70366/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70366 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
