bcraig added a subscriber: bcraig.

================
Comment at: include/atomic:859
@@ +858,3 @@
+template <> _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR bool __libcpp_always_lock_free<char32_t> = 2 == 
ATOMIC_CHAR32_T_LOCK_FREE;
+template <> _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR bool __libcpp_always_lock_free<wchar_t> = 2 == 
ATOMIC_WCHAR_T_LOCK_FREE;
+template <> _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR bool __libcpp_always_lock_free<short> = 2 == 
ATOMIC_SHORT_LOCK_FREE;
----------------
Do we need to support configurations were wchar_t is a typedef to an integer 
type, or is that an abomination too painful to deal with?

I have no idea if the rest of libcxx attempts to deal with wchar_t typedefs.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17951



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to