baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In D77229#1969524 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77229#1969524>, @NoQ wrote:
> In D77229#1969455 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77229#1969455>, > @baloghadamsoftware wrote: > > > The problem is that the `CFGElement` for function `iterator begin() { > > return iterator(_start); }` is just a `CFGStmt` and not > > `CFGCXXRecordTypedCall`. > > > In which code? It's not about the function, it's about the caller context. Hmm, it seems that if I do not use the return value of the function explicitly, then no construction context is generated for it. Maybe this is how it should work so I have to modify the tests. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77229/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77229 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
