george.burgess.iv abandoned this revision. george.burgess.iv added a comment.
Nothing in the real world :) I was writing test-cases for a soon-to-be-in-your-inbox patch, and initially wrote `memcpy` recursion in terms of `memcpy`, rather than `__builtin_memcpy`. Wasn't sure if this was an oversight, or intended. The comments around the use of this through `isTriviallyRecursive` said "a[n externally-available] function that calls itself is clearly not equivalent to the real implementation." Since this behavior is intentional, I'll see if I can make that commentary a bit more clear instead. Thanks! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78148/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78148 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
