labath added a comment. David's example does work with gdb without -Wl,--gdb-index (the member variable is shown), presumably due to the aforementioned fuzzy matching. However, it does not work if gdb-index is enabled, nor with lldb (as lldb is always very index-oriented and assumes equality everywhere). That is definitely not ideal, though I'm not sure that means about this patch. This is definitely not the only difference in the formatting of DW_AT_names of templates. For example, `template<typename T> operator<<(T, T)` will come out as `operator<< <A>` with gcc, but as `operator<<<A>` with clang (with or without this patch). OTOH, differences in type names are more likely to cause problems than is the case for functions/operators.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76801/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76801 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
