fghanim marked 4 inline comments as done.
fghanim added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmtOpenMP.cpp:878
+              [this, VDInit, OriginalAddr, VD, ThisFirstprivateIsLastprivate,
+               OrigVD, &Lastprivates, IRef, &OMPBuilder]() {
                 // Emit private VarDecl with copy init.
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> Is this needed?
All these are changes that I forgot to remove after I created a special version 
for `EmitOMPFirstprivateClause`  in D79677 for the OMPBuilder


================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h:1581
+        ++I;
+
+      return &*I;
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> What is wrong with `BB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbgOrLifetime()`? If it is to avoid 
> too many test changes, please add a TODO. I think from a functional 
> perspective there is no need to advance it after the first set of allocas 
> that may be separated from the phis by non-allocas?
Nothing wrong with it. The first while loop, I just came across a case that I 
don't remember at the moment that had an instruction that wasn't an alloca, and 
I wanted to skip over that.
the second while, is to get to the first non-alloca instruction. The purpose is 
to be able to insert new allocas, after already generated allocas.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79676/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79676



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to