xazax.hun added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp:633
+
+  // Check if LHS is 0.  It's a special case when the result is guaranteed
+  // to be 0 no matter what RHS is (we put to the side the case when RHS is
----------------
I wonder if we actually need this? I vaguely recall that we are doing a lot of 
simplifications during building symbolic expressions. I would be surprised if 
this identity is not handled there. (And in that case, probable this should be 
added there.) Or we might need a comment to explain why do we need this 
simplification at both places. 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D80117/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D80117



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to