xazax.hun added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp:1013
+    addToFunctionSummaryMap(
+        "__buf_size_arg_constraint_mul",
+        Summary(ArgTypes{ConstVoidPtrTy, SizeTy, SizeTy}, RetType{IntTy},
----------------
martong wrote:
> xazax.hun wrote:
> > Why do we need these test functions? Above I saw `fread` as an example that 
> > requires this capability. Wouldn't it be better to make its summary utilize 
> > the new feature and use `fread` in tests? Do I miss something?
> Yeah, we could test that with `fread`. However, in `fread` there are multiple 
> argument constraints for the different args. I wanted a test function which 
> has this arg constraint in an isolation. In my opinion it is good to have 
> small isolated unit tests that test only one functionality. Also if we decide 
> to remove or modify `fread`s summary for any reason, then we should modify 
> this test too, on the other hand, with this test function it is not a problem.
I see. The plan in the future is to split this checker up a bit. In this case 
I'd like to have these test functions in a separate test checker. Until then 
I'm fine with a FIXME/TODO.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77148/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77148



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to