aaron.ballman added a comment. In D80603#2057970 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80603#2057970>, @oontvoo wrote:
> In D80603#2057014 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80603#2057014>, @aaron.ballman > wrote: > > > Does the `hasParameter()` matcher not already do this? > > > Yes, it does. But we'd like it to be able to match on the parmVarDecl(). I'm sorry if I'm being dense, but `hasParameter` traverses to the `ParmVarDecl`, so I'm not certain I understand why this new matcher is needed as a public matcher. It seems like you can already accomplish this without adding a second API to do effectively the same thing: `functionDecl(hasParameter(0, parmVarDecl().bind("param")))`, can't you? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80603/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80603 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
