xazax.hun added a comment. In D78933#2054195 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78933#2054195>, @ASDenysPetrov wrote:
> @xazax.hun, any thoughts? I think we should check it on some more projects. We saw vastly different analyzer behavior on other projects in the past. I think you should be able to run it on any cmake project that supports windows by generating compilation database and using scan-build-py (in case other methods did not work). Overall, the performance penalty does not look that bad. But I wonder how would this compare to a solution that also handles transitivity. We did not really look into the alternatives yet. I'd like to know what @vsavchenko thinks as Valeriy is more into this kind of stuff lately. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78933/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78933 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
