LukeGeeson marked an inline comment as done.
LukeGeeson added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/aarch64-bf16-dotprod-intrinsics.ll:4
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_vbfdot_f32
+; CHECK: bfdot v0.2s, v1.4h, v2.4h
+define <2 x float> @test_vbfdot_f32(<2 x float> %r, <4 x bfloat> %a, <4 x
bfloat> %b) {
----------------
miyuki wrote:
> LukeGeeson wrote:
> > LukeGeeson wrote:
> > > miyuki wrote:
> > > > Would it make sense to check the whole body of the compiled function?
> > > Oops sorry, having all kinds of issues with my commit history here, give
> > > me a moment to address this
> > I would say it's not worth testing the whole function here, the only code
> > emitted for each is the instruction mentioned in the `CHECK` and a `ret`
> > surrounded by lot's of compiler labels and directives that we don't need to
> > test here
> I meant, just the code from the first BB label to ret (inclusive), without
> directives. I suggest using `llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py` to
> generate the checks.
Hopefully this is everything now, please let me know if there is anything else
:)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80752/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80752
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
