njames93 marked an inline comment as done. njames93 added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-else-after-return.rst:74 + + When `true`, The check will attempt to refactor a variable defined inside + the condition of the ``if`` statement that is used in the ``else`` branch. ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > The -> the > > I'm a bit unclear on what "attempt to refactor" means -- I sort of understand > it to mean that if this option is true then the check will not produce a > fix-it for variables defined inside the condition of the if statement that is > used in the else branch, but will produce a diagnostic. However, the check > behavior seems to also remove the diagnostic in this case (not just the > fix-it), so I'm not certain I'm reading this right. Good spot, the check behaviour is also removing the diagnostic as well as the fix it. That behaviour should probably be changed to removing the Fix-It when this option is `false`, but then diagnostic behaviour should follow what `WarnOnUnfixable` dictates. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D82824/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D82824 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits