avl marked an inline comment as done.
avl added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp:474
+ // Operand Bundles or not marked as TailCall.
+ if (CI->isNoTailCall() || CI->hasOperandBundles() || !CI->isTailCall())
return nullptr;
----------------
efriedma wrote:
> The hasOperandBundles() check looks completely new; is there some test for it?
>
> The `isNoTailCall()` check is currently redundant; it isn't legal to write
> "tail notail". I guess it makes sense to guard against that, though.
>The hasOperandBundles() check looks completely new; is there some test for it?
it is not new. it is copied from 245 line. Now, when patch changed from its
original state all above conditions could be changed just to :
if (!CI->isTailCall())
the test is Transforms/TailCallElim/deopt-bundle.ll
>The isNoTailCall() check is currently redundant; it isn't legal to write "tail
>notail". I guess it makes sense to guard against that, though.
would add checking for that.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82085/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82085
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
