akhuang added a comment. In D84870#2182463 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84870#2182463>, @dblaikie wrote:
> I think it'd be good to separate these two issues/patches. > > In part because I'm curious whether, even with a trivial ctor - if we did the > retained types thing - would that be enough? I think just the retained types thing wouldn't help in this case because the trivial ctor is not emitted? I tried it and the struct is still fwd declared. I could split out the retained types change, though. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D84870/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D84870 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
