spatel added a comment.

In D85787#2214038 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85787#2214038>, @lebedev.ri wrote:

> @ reviewers - i'm not so much interested in deep code/algo review,
> but more like in the general direction disscussion, like, is this okay for 
> instcombine? :)

The test diffs look great, and it seems to at least pay for itself in 
compile-time impact, so I think it's a good direction. There's always a 
question of "is this substantial enough (or would it grow enough with the 
'TODO' items) to be a stand-alone pass?".

Haven't had a chance to look at the code itself yet. Do we have tests where 
there are extra uses of the extracted values?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D85787/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D85787

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to