spatel added a comment. In D85787#2214038 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85787#2214038>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> @ reviewers - i'm not so much interested in deep code/algo review, > but more like in the general direction disscussion, like, is this okay for > instcombine? :) The test diffs look great, and it seems to at least pay for itself in compile-time impact, so I think it's a good direction. There's always a question of "is this substantial enough (or would it grow enough with the 'TODO' items) to be a stand-alone pass?". Haven't had a chance to look at the code itself yet. Do we have tests where there are extra uses of the extracted values? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85787/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85787 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits