vrnithinkumar marked an inline comment as done.
vrnithinkumar added a comment.

In D86373#2231605 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86373#2231605>, @NoQ wrote:

> This is easier than D86293 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86293> because there's 
> no old value in the freshly constructed smart pointer, right? I suspect that 
> you can still re-use a lot of the implementation with D86293 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86293>, at least partially.

Refactored to reuse the implementation.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86373/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86373

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to