ctetreau added a comment. In D86065#2241146 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065#2241146>, @david-arm wrote:
> Hi @ctetreau, ok for now I'm going to completely remove the operators and > revert the code using those operators to how it was before. ... This is probably for the best. In D86065#2241146 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065#2241146>, @david-arm wrote: > ... I'm not sure what you mean about the predicate functions ... I'm referring to providing some built in way to std::sort a collection of ElementCount or have a std::set<ElementCount>. By default, C++ wants to use operator< for this, which I believe was the original motivation for the operator being here in the first place. I think it's reasonable for ElementCount to provide a built-in function to establish an ordering for these purposes, but the function should be named such that nobody thinks the function is intended to be the mathematical relation. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
