rsmith added a comment.

In D86993#2251198 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993#2251198>, @rjmccall wrote:

> Wording looks good.  Should we alsso document our assumptions about what 
> functions exist in the standard library — the functions that we'll always use 
> even in freestanding builds?

Sounds like a good idea to me. Do we have a list?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D86993: D... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to