efriedma added a comment. > Keeping loads and stores of pointers as pointers to the extent possible > doesn't seem like a bad idea, but I'm worried people will feel like this > gives a *semantic* guarantee that isn't really there. Fundamentally, LLVM > still doesn't currently have typed memory. All of the optimizer is built upon > this assumption.
LLVM currently isn't internally consistent. See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34548 . I should probably make a LangRef patch so the "pointer aliasing" section indicates there's an issue here. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88789/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88789 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
