aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/CMakeLists.txt:37
+  clangLex
+  clangSerialization
   clangTidy
----------------
Why do serialization and lex need to be pulled in?


================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ConstCorrectnessCheck.cpp:46
+
+void ConstCorrectnessCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+  const auto ConstType = hasType(isConstQualified());
----------------
Should this check only fire in C++? I'm sort of on the fence. It's a C++ core 
guideline, so it stands to reason it should be disabled for C code. But 
const-correctness is a thing in C too. WDYT?


================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ConstCorrectnessCheck.cpp:105
+
+  // Each variable can only in one category: Value, Pointer, Reference.
+  // Analysis can be controlled for every category.
----------------
can only in -> can only be in


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to