njames93 added a comment.

In D80531#2352944 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80531#2352944>, @kkleine wrote:

> @dblaikie sorry for the late feedback. The `LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR:BOOL` will 
> "Stop and fail the build, if a compiler warning is triggered. Defaults to 
> OFF." I wonder if any other test fails from clang tidy because. My test 
> explicitly checks that a warning is issued (e.g. `// CHECK-MESSAGES-DEFAULT: 
> :[[@LINE-2]]:3: warning: prefer deleting`) and when the `LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR` 
> propagates to this piece, it will indeed fail the build. But I wonder why 
> this doesn't happen to the other clang-tidy checks. @njames93  
> @Eugene.Zelenko any ideas?

The reason WERROR causes this to fail is the tests are generating a warning 
`Wextra-semi` for the `;` that appear after each macro usage in the class. 
clang-tidy would ignore this diagnostic as its set-up to ignore all warnings 
from clang.
However when Werror is set, that warning is promoted to an error, and 
clang-tidy will emit all errors, regardless of their origin.
This causes there to be extra diagnostics in the tests, though only in the 
tests where you invoke clang-tidy directly. Not sure why that obeys 
`LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR` likewise not sure why check_clang_tidy doesn't obey it.
Anyway the simple fix is to just remove the `;` after the macro usages in the 
class


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D80531/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D80531

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to