tra added a comment. In D90409#2371679 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90409#2371679>, @jlebar wrote:
>> LGTM. I think the change would make sense for CUDA, too. @jlebar - WDYT? > > I agree that the C and C++ standard libraries should behave the same in CUDA > mode and host mode! > > But if doing so would make our behavior different than nvcc's, maybe we could > emit a warning or something? Like, "this code you wrote maybe for nvcc is > going to do something different with clang." Interestingly enough CUDA 10.1+ already promotes integer `fma()` arguments to double: https://godbolt.org/z/crbqTe I wonder what makes HIP different to require this change. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90409/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90409 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
