rnk added a subscriber: EricWF. rnk added a comment. In D90719#2372463 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90719#2372463>, @dblaikie wrote:
> Does Chromium need this fixed in clang? Or if it were fixed in libc++ would > that be adequate? (does Chromium's build need to work with old libc++s, or > does it always build with a libc++ that matches the compiler? (in the latter > case, a fix in libc++ would be as good as a fix in clang)) Well, we'd like to make this new type homing behavior the default, and it wouldn't work with old libc++ versions, and there is the general possibility that there is code out there like this libc++ code that has implicit nontrivial constructors that are not used. So, I wouldn't think so much about what's right for Chrome, and more about what's right for Clang. If we do want to fix libc++, I'd warn you that the code is subtle. It takes care to construct the node value in a particular way, and it sets a flag after construction succeeds, which perhaps affects exception safety: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/libcxx/include/__hash_table#L2456 + @EricWF Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90719/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90719 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
