njames93 added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/Diagnostics.cpp:636
+    // Filter out any reformat fixits, we don't handle these.
+    // FIXME: Can we?
+    llvm::erase_if(FixIts,
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> in theory yes, as we have access to source manager, we can fetch file 
> contents and create formatted  replacements (see `cleanupAndFormat`). but 
> formatting those fixes can imply significant delays on clangd's diagnostic 
> cycles (if there are many of those), that's the reason why we currently don't 
> format fixits.
I mean if clangd is extended to support async code actions for diagnostics 
instead of just using the inline extension. Having said that, if that were the 
case, this would probably not be where that support is implemented.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/Diagnostics.cpp:637
+    // FIXME: Can we?
+    llvm::erase_if(FixIts,
+                   [](const FixItHint &Fix) { return Fix.isReformatFixit(); });
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> rather than doing an extra loop, can we just skip those in the for loop below 
> ?
We could, however that would result in messier code further down when trying to 
build a synthetic message.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91103/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91103

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to