sbenza added a comment.

> > We can proceed with this change if you want, but it is not required 
> > anymore. I don't know whether we need the extra complexity of 
> > `TemplateArgumentLess`.

> 

> 

> If this patch is not going to help with performance, I'm happy to abandon it.


It might help in the cases where you are doing hasAncestor with 
TemplateArgument bound nodes, but that is a small corner case and I don't think 
we need to optimize for it.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D19144



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to