ahatanak added a comment. In D92808#2443006 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808#2443006>, @compnerd wrote:
> There is nothing particularly special about that. The reason for the funclet > handling there is that in the case of an outlined block for exception > handling (i.e. a funclet), we need to ensure that the assembly marker > received the funclet token as failure to do so would mark the assembly as > unreachable and would thus thwart the auto-release claim. For the normal > codepath, the behaviour should be identical. ARC contract pass removes attribute retainRV/claimRV (but not attribute rv_marker) from a call and inserts a retainRV/claimRV call after the call in the IR. In that case, the inserted retainRV/claimRV should get the funclet token. Is that right? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
