svenvh added a comment.

In D91348#2475646 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91348#2475646>, @Anastasia wrote:

> LGTM, the change seems reasonable. Thanks!
>
>> A minor side-effect of this change is that it also produces the
>> warning for co_await and co_yield now.
>
> This warning is produced for **sizeof** and it seems like a duplication of 
> another diagnostic that occurs for this case.

It aligns the note diagnostics for `sizeof` and `vec_step` for this case indeed.

> Btw just a suggestion - it is better to upload a full diff because the 
> regular diff is not reliable in the Phabricator as line numbers change 
> quickly in the repository and there is no information on the parent commit 
> for the patch.

Apologies, I normally do so but forgot to provide the full context this time.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91348/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91348

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to