Sunil_Srivastava created this revision.
Sunil_Srivastava added reviewers: jstenglein, erichkeane.
Sunil_Srivastava requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: clang.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.

The check for the value passed to __buildtin_return_address needs to be guarded 
by check for the Dependent context, or else it runs into an assertion failure 
in the test case given below.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D94438

Files:
  clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
  clang/test/Sema/builtin-returnaddress.c


Index: clang/test/Sema/builtin-returnaddress.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Sema/builtin-returnaddress.c
+++ clang/test/Sema/builtin-returnaddress.c
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wframe-address -verify %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wmost -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -fsyntax-only -Wframe-address -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -fsyntax-only -Wmost -verify %s
 
 void* a(unsigned x) {
 return __builtin_return_address(0);
@@ -17,3 +19,14 @@
 return __builtin_frame_address(1); // expected-warning{{calling 
'__builtin_frame_address' with a nonzero argument is unsafe}}
 }
 
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+template<int N> void *RA()
+{
+  return __builtin_return_address(N); // expected-warning{{calling 
'__builtin_return_address' with a nonzero argument is unsafe}}
+}
+
+void *foo()
+{
+ return RA<2>(); // expected-note{{in instantiation of function template 
specialization 'RA<2>' requested here}}
+}
+#endif
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
@@ -1942,7 +1942,8 @@
     // -Wframe-address warning if non-zero passed to builtin
     // return/frame address.
     Expr::EvalResult Result;
-    if (TheCall->getArg(0)->EvaluateAsInt(Result, getASTContext()) &&
+    if (!TheCall->getArg(0)->isValueDependent() &&
+        TheCall->getArg(0)->EvaluateAsInt(Result, getASTContext()) &&
         Result.Val.getInt() != 0)
       Diag(TheCall->getBeginLoc(), diag::warn_frame_address)
           << ((BuiltinID == Builtin::BI__builtin_return_address)


Index: clang/test/Sema/builtin-returnaddress.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Sema/builtin-returnaddress.c
+++ clang/test/Sema/builtin-returnaddress.c
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wframe-address -verify %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wmost -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -fsyntax-only -Wframe-address -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -fsyntax-only -Wmost -verify %s
 
 void* a(unsigned x) {
 return __builtin_return_address(0);
@@ -17,3 +19,14 @@
 return __builtin_frame_address(1); // expected-warning{{calling '__builtin_frame_address' with a nonzero argument is unsafe}}
 }
 
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+template<int N> void *RA()
+{
+  return __builtin_return_address(N); // expected-warning{{calling '__builtin_return_address' with a nonzero argument is unsafe}}
+}
+
+void *foo()
+{
+ return RA<2>(); // expected-note{{in instantiation of function template specialization 'RA<2>' requested here}}
+}
+#endif
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
@@ -1942,7 +1942,8 @@
     // -Wframe-address warning if non-zero passed to builtin
     // return/frame address.
     Expr::EvalResult Result;
-    if (TheCall->getArg(0)->EvaluateAsInt(Result, getASTContext()) &&
+    if (!TheCall->getArg(0)->isValueDependent() &&
+        TheCall->getArg(0)->EvaluateAsInt(Result, getASTContext()) &&
         Result.Val.getInt() != 0)
       Diag(TheCall->getBeginLoc(), diag::warn_frame_address)
           << ((BuiltinID == Builtin::BI__builtin_return_address)
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to