dblaikie added a comment. What parts of this are motivated by CodeView requirements (do functions have to have unique names in CV?)? It'd be a bit unfortunate if we have divergence in -gmlt behavior between DWARF and CodeView due to different usage requirements, rather than format requirements - gmlt in DWARF I think uses only the unqualified name, though eventually combined with -fdebug-info-for-profiling which put the mangled name on such functions to make it clear for profilers. (though the unqualified name only behavior is still handy for the sanitizers - where the unqualified/ambiguous name is a "good enough" point for size V accuracy)
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D94639/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D94639 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
