mtrofin added a comment.

In D93078#2500114 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93078#2500114>, @jdoerfert wrote:

> In D93078#2500040 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93078#2500040>, @mtrofin wrote:
>
>> In D93078#2500032 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93078#2500032>, @jdoerfert 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In D93078#2499996 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93078#2499996>, @mtrofin wrote:
>>>
>>>> In D93078#2499995 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93078#2499995>, @jdoerfert 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure how this is more helpful. What is the use case where this 
>>>>> way of warning helps?
>>>>
>>>> For tests other than attributor, that explicitly set FileCheck 
>>>> --allow-unused-prefixes=true, these warnings mean that there will be 
>>>> unused prefixes (those listed)
>>>
>>> Should not we check for that flag in the RUN line then and only warn for 
>>> unused prefixes when it is set. If there is no prefix we should obviously 
>>> always warn.
>>
>> That's a good idea. Probably we'd need to also make sure that the unused 
>> prefixes are all on RUN lines with --allow-unused-prefixes=true.
>>
>> I'm also not sure how lit.local.cfg interacts with the test prefix updater: 
>> currently, the only cases where we bulk-want to allow unused prefixes is the 
>> Attributor tests. If you were going to add the flag explicitly, that'd also 
>> work. Or just the option to the update_test_prefix that says "ok with 
>> duplicates, don't warn"
>
> I can add the option explicitly (D94744 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94744>). 
> We should look for the filecheck one if possible, two options means double 
> the hassle. That said, why are we warning in both FileCheck and 
> update_test_check, it seems to be unnecessary to do the latter.

update_test_prefix.py's role is temporary: once we flip FileCheck to disallow 
unused prefixes by default, we don't need to keep it around. At that point, it 
becomes important for the update_<xyz>_test_check scripts to warn.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93078/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93078

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to