sammccall added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.h:147
 
-    bool SuggestMissingIncludes = false;
-
----------------
hokein wrote:
> our internal client explicitly set this to `true`, so we need a migration 
> plan for this, otherwise this would break our build of internal client during 
> the integration, a possible plan is
> 
> 1. set this flag to true by default in upstream, wait for the integration
> 2. remove the explicit setting internally
> 3. remove this flag (this patch) in upstream
> 
> Or just remove the flag internally, then land this patch in upstream (but 
> internal release has to pick-up these two together)
Discussed offline - there's no reason to block for out-of-tree clients here.

(We're removing support for a configuration - SuggestMissingIncludes = false - 
which is AFAIK unused anywhere. And we're removing the flag as well, but this 
is a trivial API change to adapt to)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D94727/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D94727

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to