modimo added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Analysis/InlineAdvisor.cpp:412
+
+  Remark << ";";
 }
----------------
wenlei wrote:
> modimo wrote:
> > wenlei wrote:
> > > nit: any special reason for adding this? doesn't seem consistent with 
> > > other remarks we have.
> > If you grab the remark outputs via `-Rpass=inline` you'll get additional 
> > suffix information:
> > ```
> > inline.cpp:8:12: remark: _Z3foov inlined into main with (cost=0, 
> > threshold=375) at callsite main:2:12; [-Rpass=inline]
> >     return foo();
> > ```
> > 
> > The semicolon is to separate the remark from any additional output at the 
> > end so when replaying we can match the correct callsite. Something like 
> > this would be unneeded for yaml replay but for the current implementation 
> > it's necessary for correctness.
> > 
> By correctness, did you mean the fact that you rely on `split(";")` in 
> parsing, or something else?
> 
> This is not a big deal, but if no other remarks end with `;`, it would be 
> good to be consistent. Using `split(";")` for parsing is just one way of 
> implementing it, and IMO could be changed to favor consistency in remarks 
> output.
> By correctness, did you mean the fact that you rely on `split(";")` in 
> parsing, or something else?

Yeah, without that we would store the callsite from remarks as `main:2:12 
[-Rpass=inline]` which would not match the actual callsite string `main:2:12` 
that we query the map with which causes replay to never inline.

> This is not a big deal, but if no other remarks end with `;`, it would be 
> good to be consistent. Using `split(";")` for parsing is just one way of 
> implementing it, and IMO could be changed to favor consistency in remarks 
> output.

Doing a search query for `OptimizationRemarkAnalysis` I see vectorizer ORE uses 
"." for their terminator so switching to that is better consistency. I'll make 
the change in an upcoming patch.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D94333/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D94333

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to