[Eric Fiselier] > Well arguable it should be `no return` or even better it should > have an "= delete" so it's diagnosed even if it's not called. > For now this works though.
Agreed - I just wasn't sure what this code was trying to do, and I figured it should be consistent. I'm trying to keep my patches minimally intrusive until I understand your tests better. Thanks, STL _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
